Aero-Engine Blade-Out Test & Containment Evaluation

Aero-Engine Blade-Out Test & Containment Evaluation

Project: Aero-Engine Blade-Out Test & Containment Evaluation

September 2023 · Shanghai Aero-Engine Test Center

Conducted controlled blade-release testing on a turbofan engine to:

  1. Evaluate containment system effectiveness

  2. Measure rotor dynamic response during catastrophic failure

  3. Validate engine shutdown protocols under extreme conditions

Test Setup

1. Instrumentation

Instrumentation
Sensor Type Location Measurement Target DAQ System
High-speed strain gauges Fan blade root Blade attachment stresses DE-924U (Ch1-8)
Triaxial accelerometers Bearing housings Casing impact forces (0-50kHz) DE-924U (Ch9-16)
Eddy current probes Rotor shaft Radial displacement (±10mm) DE-928U (Ch1-4)
Infrared thermocouples Oil sump Bearing temperature (0-300°C) DE-928U (Ch5-8)

2. Trigger & Synchronization

  • Explosive bolt initiator: T0 trigger (μs accuracy)

  • Photon high-speed camera: 100,000 fps for visual correlation

  • All systems synchronized via IEEE 1588 PTP (≤5μs jitter)


Test Sequence

1. Pre-Failure (T-10s to T0)

  •     Engine stabilized at 85% N1 (12,500 RPM)

  •     Baseline vibration: ≤2.5mm/s RMS

2. Blade Release (T0)

  •     Explosive severing of 3rd stage compressor blade

  •     Data recorded at 1MS/s during 0-100ms event

3. Post-Failure (T0+ to 60s)

  •     Rotor coast-down monitoring

  •     Fire suppression system activation logging

Critical Data

1. Rotor Dynamics

Rotor Dynamics
Parameter Peak Value Time After T0
Shaft displacement 8.2mm (radial) 18ms
Bearing acceleration 235g (axial) 22ms
Casing strain 1.2% (at mounts) 41ms

2. Thermal Response

  •     Oil temp spike: 85°C → 210°C in 400ms

  •     Shaft FOD-induced friction: 15kW heat generation

3. Containment

  •     Debris velocity: 287m/s (within FEM prediction ±5%)

  •     Casing penetration: 0 (full containment achieved)


Engineering Outcomes

Design Verification

  • Confirmed rotor burst speed exceeds FAR 33.94 requirements by 23%

  • Validated fire-resistant seals maintained integrity

Safety Systems

  • Auto-shutdown triggered in 58ms (meeting EASA CS-E 780)

  • Oil scavenge pumps prevented secondary fires

Predictive Model Calibration

  • Updated FEM material failure criteria for:

    • Titanium alloy blade fracture modes

    • Composite containment energy absorption

Technical Terms

  • N1: Low-pressure spool speed

  • FOD: Foreign Object Damage

  • CS-E: Certification Specifications for Engines

This test demonstrated world-class containment capability, with the DE-Series systems capturing sub-millisecond transient phenomena critical for aviation safety certification. The data supported first-pass approval by CAAC and FAA regulators.

Previous
Previous

1500-Channel Integrated Data Acquisition System

Next
Next

Aircraft Landing Gear Static Load & Deformation Test